Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Farmageddon


From the Netflix blurb: "Farmageddon tells the story of farms that were providing safe, healthy foods to their communities but were forced to stop."

I have a list of documentaries lined up on Netflix that I have not taken the time to watch, and today I decided that it was important to do so. I chose to watch Farmageddon because it seemed to be of the most interest to me, considering my interest in local and sustainable farming, as well as my current connection with EverythingFarm.com.  I knew what kind of film it was, and that I would sit and slowly simmer with outrage. Still, it's important. So I watched.

Milk is good! (1)
The lady who put the film together, Kristin Canty, is a typical mom with a child who had allergy issues and asthma. When she switched the child to raw milk, his allergies disappeared, seemingly healed. Her whole family got healthier because the food they were buying was whole and local, and real. The state eventually shut down her raw milk supplier, and she's now unable to get raw milk without smuggling it in from another state, a Federal offense. Yes, you read that right - it's illegal to go into another state and buy raw milk for your own personal use.

As an aside, the Center for Disease Control has a whole FAQ up about raw milk and the terrible dangers of drinking it. What they don't mention is that they recently were forced to admit that no one has died from drinking contaminated raw milk (and they don't mention that several people have died from drinking pasteurized milk). There's a lot of manipulation and lies involved when it comes to the wording on these "official" websites. It's scary to think that these people are supposed to be the ones interested in our safety.

Lambs frolicking (2)
To return to the film, there is a section about a sheep farmer in Vermont who was targeted by Linda Detwiler (then part of USDA). The Failace family brought in sheep from the UK and Australia as part of their family business. They willingly submitted to the month of isolation before leaving the UK, then another two full months of isolation in America, in order to prove the safety of their herds. They kept full medical records, went through all required inspections, and did more than they were asked in keeping their sheep healthy and happy. After following through, they began raising their sheep and enjoying their new farm life. Then the inspections began, and the raids, the removal of milk "for testing" and eventually the removal of all their sheep and most of their equipment.

All this was done in the name of public safety. The USDA claimed that the Failace's sheep were harboring a variant of Mad Cow Disease, despite all the testing and isolation and such. They even went so far as to go into their hay fields and remove the hay because "it was dangerous," claiming it was being incinerated. Mr. Failace became increasingly suspicious of this, and eventually followed one of the trucks removing their hay. It went to a local landfill and was dumped among the other organic materials. This was how they were disposing of this "dangerous" hay.

Spying? Really? (3)
The government spent millions on this case. They hired people to watch the farm, the people who lived there, and all those who purchased anything from the farm. They investigated anyone who made purchases or who sported bumper stickers in support of the Failaces. After years of fighting, Linda Detwiler was eventually forced under oath to explain that they had no evidence of any sheep or animal on the farm either being ill or even being exposed to a disease. The Failaces won their court case, but at what cost?

I could go on about the various atrocities committed in the name of the government. The movie is full of them. There are important facts that came to light, though, throughout the movie. First and foremost, despite trying on several occasions, they couldn't get anyone from any of the government agencies to talk to them on camera. Not one department would stand up and defend their actions on the small farms.

There are many reasons we have the system we have. There was a time, both in America and abroad, that milk production and food production had no oversight and there was a lot of disease going around. Our society was trying to find more efficient ways to feed the booming population, but the science hadn't caught up yet. Pasteurization, for instance, is not a bad thing per se. It is something we should use when necessary, for the sterilization of milk and other foods during times when we can't be as careful about the safety when it's gathered. During an emergency, for instance, the cleaning routines of commercial cows simply can't be kept up, and pasteurization will allow us to keep the milk coming without causing problems. But in a non-emergency situation, on local farms and at the community level, people can visit farms and make their own decisions as to whether they want their milk pasteurized.

So much paperwork! (4)
The paperwork that is in place for farms is ridiculous. Large farms have to have full time staff to deal with the amount of paperwork they need to process. Unfortunately, similar amounts of paperwork are required of small, family run farms as well, and there is no ability to hire staff to fill out all the forms. The staff are the family and maybe a few friends. Safety is important, yes, but to treat a commercial abattoir in the same way you treat a little backyard farm doing a chicken slaughter for their own family is simply ridiculous. That is what's happening, though.

There was a lot said about the safety and dangers of raw milk throughout the movie. However, one woman who was interviewed at a farmer's market said something that made me really pause. The USDA thinks it's just fine for a mother to feed her child sugar bombs for breakfast and fast food every meal of the day, smoke during pregnancy, and other harmful things, but that it's a Federal crime to buy raw milk for your family. That certainly puts it into perspective.

The question that keeps coming up, in this film and others like it, is what is motivating the government to come down on all these little farms? Honestly, I realize that there are probably statistically as many bad "little farms" as there are commercial ones, but we're just not seeing the numbers. I dislike using statistics for proving things, as they're so easy to manipulate and most people don't really understand them, but I'm not seeing the numbers. The math is wrong. The problems we're seeing are huge ones. Bags of contaminated spinach across the country are not coming from small farms, they're coming from commercial farms.

So we ask again . . . why? The easy answer is to say that the huge agricultural corporations are buying out our politicians, and certainly that's part of what's going on. It can't be all of it, though, because the bottom line is that not everyone in our country is going to want to or be able to purchase raw milk and locally produced organic vegetables. Even with the government on their side, the prices for such items will always be higher than for mass produced eggs, meat, and vegetables. Even if the small farms won every case and suddenly had everything they wanted, Big Farm isn't going away. It can't. It may be part of the answer, but it definitely isn't all of it.

There are a lot of hints as to what's going on, but no clear answers. Last year, the FDA was brought up on charges for blocking the sale of raw milk across state lines. The, ". . . FDA moved the court to dismiss the case, and in its motion stated that a) there is No Absolute Right to Consume or Feed Children Any Particular Food, b) there is No Generalized Right to Bodily and Physical Health."

As a stand-alone statement, that's pretty scary. It can seem rational, if you consider someone who wants to have the right to feed their kid nothing but salt and vinegar chips, certainly, but when approached from the point of view of a family needing to meet the needs of a child with an allergy, it suddenly looks very grim.

Much of the movie showed raw footage of Federal agents involved in raiding, either taken by the various families involved or from security cameras. Sometimes warrants were involved, and other times they were not. In each and every piece of raid footage I saw, there were firearms (many of them) out and being pointed at the families. None of the families were resisting at all, and most were simply terrified and comforting small children who were sobbing with fear. None of the footage included armed people other than the authorities involved. When I looked up a few of the court cases online, I saw not a single mention of resisting, interfering, or otherwise getting in the way of the agents.

I don't want to paint the local police officers and sheriffs with the same tar and feathers as the Feds, though. While the local authorities were included in the raids, none of them looked very happy about what they were doing. In two pieces of footage, the officers were almost in tears, explaining to the farmers that they were required to do this and to please not interfere with the Feds. This does not appear to be a local issue, and that stands true among the small local farmers that I know personally, as well. This is a Federal issue.

Tidy and beautiful (5)
The farms in the film were all fairly tidy, and the animals were clean and appeared healthy. Most of the shots including humans showed the farmers or their children playing with or spending time with their livestock. The farms weren't perfect, though. There was mud, there was cow dung, and there were straggly looking turkeys who had obviously decided to stand in the rain rather than go into their house. Nothing looked unsanitary, and none of the animals appeared to be living in the kind if filth that they would in a factory farm.

The case of Manna Storehouse, a private (not public) business co-op, is frightening.  To deal with a small farm group serving about 100 people, they brought in 11 policemen, all with guns drawn, in full SWAT gear. The Mrs. Stowers and several of her children were held at gunpoint for six or seven hours in a single room of their home. One child, who had been holding a cell phone when the police entered, was forced to the ground and frisked. When the father got home, he was frisked and required to join them. The police took their computers and all their records, as well as their personal food. The charge was "failure to have a food permit", which is a third degree misdemeanor, something that warrants a $500 fine, is not a Federal offense, and is indeed considered very minor.

None of these small farms and co-ops were recipients of complaints. No one got ill from eating their food. There are no health issues at all associated with any of them. The farmers actually invite people in to see their operations, to inspect the living conditions of the livestock. They aren't trying to avoid the law, either, and seem to be accepting of necessary health inspections of their premises.

Why is our government spending millions upon millions of dollars to persecute and prosecute small farms? It really makes no sense. The claims that it's a giant conspiracy make me want to cringe, but as time goes on and I see more and more of this kind of behavior, I feel like there is no other option. I can't find a definitive trail as to "where the money goes" and I can't see who really gets a benefit out of this.

The most terrifying claim I've heard to date is that perhaps "Big Agriculture" is putting things in our food supply to make us more compliant. I don't even know if it's necessary, to be honest. The vast majority seem blissfully unaware that their food supplies are hanging in such a precarious balance. Perhaps that's the most scary thing of all.

Check back often for information on canning, preserving, general homesteading and more. If you have questions or comments, please write to me below. I love to answer questions! You can follow the blog via Network Blogs and Google Friend Connect (see the left hand column for the button). If you purchase items I have linked through Amazon or the ads on my site, I receive an affiliate portion of the sale. If you find the items are useful, please purchase from my site! 
 
You may also be interested in:

Tires
New life!
Keeping warm
Quick pesto'd pasta with oysters
A good weekend's work

1) Image by Matthew Hull / morgueFile
2) Image by Eric Pruis / morgueFile
3) Image by wintersixfour / morgueFile
4) Image by doctor_bob / morgueFile
5) Image by jade / morgueFile

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Review and Giveaway!

My beautiful box of Mara's Pasta!
Earlier this month, I had the opportunity to receive a box of Mara's Pasta for review, and I accepted with a joyful squee. I have wanted to try Mara's Pasta for some time now, and with money being tight, I hadn't been able to. Being chosen to be a reviewer was amazing and wonderful!

Even the box is pretty
I have decided to draw out my review into three posts, since I was sent three types of pasta to taste: spaghetti (today's post), linguine (later this week), and farfalle (next week). I am also doing a taste comparison with some of hubby's home-made whole wheat pasta. He upped the ante for this first taste test, as well, creating not only a whole wheat pasta comparable to Mara's, but a tomato-basil pasta as well. He was determined to "win" the contest and be declared the most tasty pasta in the house.

Spaghetti, a la Mara
The first challenge was with Mara's spaghetti, topped with a cheater's sauce (a jar of organic spaghetti sauce spiced up and with browned sausage meat added). Mara's pasta comes in a plain brown box, and inside the box is a plastic wrapper to keep the pasta together. A couple of pieces were broken, but that was it. Compared to store-bought spaghetti, it was in much nicer condition. I liked the plain box, and I appreciated the simplicity of the ingredients list.

Ingredients: whole wheat
As you can see, Mara's Pasta is made with 100% whole wheat flour, and nothing more. It's a very dark colored pasta, with a smooth, silky texture when dry. When I opened the box, there was a slight scent of whole wheat, but nothing overpowering. The pasta looks extruded (meaning it was pushed out of a pasta machine as opposed to cutting it), but beside my store bought white spaghetti it looked rustic and much more tasty. It was also a lot smoother than the pasta that hubby made, as his is cut and not extruded.

The three contenders
Hubby's whole wheat pasta was made with home ground flour (we buy wheat berries and grind our own) and egg, and the tomato pasta was home ground flour, egg, and tomato-basil powder we made over the summer from our own tomatoes. Our wheat is hard white winter and grinds up quite fine. We use it in pastas and breads and doughs of all kinds, sometimes alone and sometimes in conjunction with store bought all purpose flour or "better for bread" type flours, depending on what we're making.

The tomato-basil pasta
We had two children (our 7 year old twins) and four adults doing our taste testing for this challenge. Among the adults, the tomato-basil was the clear winner, but we also considered it slightly a cheat since it was up against a plain pasta. Hubby did manage to pull off a rather lovely, smooth pasta. He mixed together spaghetti and linguine shapes because of issues with his manual pasta machine, but the flavor was pretty good. Surprisingly, while the children didn't dislike it, their favorite was the Mara's Pasta!

Mara's spaghetti
Mara's spaghetti was smoother and cooked much more evenly. I over-cooked it slightly, so if you like your pasta el dente, try it at eight minutes rather than the suggested ten. There was absolutely no clumping in this spaghetti, which was nice. I didn't stir it over-much, because I wanted to see how it performed. Hubby's spaghetti did clump a bit (the plain whole wheat one a lot), despite dedicated stirring and attempts to keep it separated. The Mara's spaghetti was also more evenly sized, and fatter than hubby's. It held the sauce well, though didn't absorb it like some pastas do.

Hubby's plain wheat pasta
The plain wheat home made pasta came last for everyone, mostly because of the clumping. Usually when we make pasta at home, we cut it and boil it right away. In an attempt to make our little contest a bit more fair, we decided to dry hubby's pasta overnight, and it was not properly separated on the drying rack. The kids didn't like it at all, and we adults were not over-fond of it either. I suspect if it had been less clumped we would have enjoyed it more.

Spaghettis with sauce
I've never been big on commercial whole wheat pastas. They always have a gritty texture to me, and sometimes the wheat flavor is overwhelming. This was not true of Mara's pasta, at all! The texture was very close to white pasta, but without the mushiness and nasty ingredients. I will definitely buy more of the Mara's pasta for those nights when we're not in the mood for or don't have time for making our own. Even our resident "white bread lover" was fine with the Mara's pasta, and that's a huge win in our family. Normally she puts up with our healthy whole grains, but her opinion of Mara's spaghetti was that she'd readily eat it again.

Mara's Pasta can be found in the following places:
Mara's Pasta Home Page: http://www.maraspasta.com/

Mara's Pasta Online Store: http://www.maraspasta.com/products-page/
Mara's Pasta email subscription: http://bit.ly/TdMwfX
Mara's Pasta Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/MarasPasta

Mara's Pasta Twitter page: https://twitter.com/#!/MarasPasta 
Mara’s Pasta Pinterest board: http://pinterest.com/maraspasta/
The giftbox you may win (1)
Now, what you've all been waiting for: the giveaway! Mara's has agreed to give a box of pasta to one lucky winner. To enter the contest, follow the Rafflecopter rules below. The winner will be required to provide me with their email address, name, and mailing address (no P.O. Boxes, sorry), which will allow us to send you the pasta. I heartily suggest you enter, because this pasta is delicious!

a Rafflecopter giveaway

Disclaimer: Mara's Pasta provided me with a free sample of this product to review, and I was under no obligation to review it if I so chose. Nor was I under any obligation to write a positive review or sponsor a product giveaway in return for the free product.

This post was shared at the Homestead Barn Hop #96 (click here to enter).

Check back often for information on canning, preserving, general homesteading and more. If you have questions or comments, please write to me below. I love to answer questions! You can follow the blog via Network Blogs and Google Friend Connect (see the left hand column for the button). If you purchase items I have linked through Amazon or the ads on my site, I receive an affiliate portion of the sale. If you find the items are useful, please purchase from my site!
 
You may also be interested in:

How to: perk coffee
Swiss Chard and Lentil Soup
Winter Wonders - making a planting schedule
Winter Wonders - the seed catalog
Mexican Meatloaf

1) Image courtesy of Mara's Pasta